Keeping Our Bisexual Ladies at Arms’ Length. the magazine has…

DIVA (between 1994 and 2004, at the least; the mag has withstood considerable improvement in the past a decade) makes an appealing instance in this regard. Though my focus is on audience interactions, i do want to start with taking a look at some editorial information, since these highlight a few of the tensions that arise in constructing lesbian (and bisexual) identities. When you look at the test, DIVA relates clearly to bisexuals reasonably infrequently, an element additionally noted by Baker ( 2008 ) in the analysis of this Uk and American national corpora. Bisexuality tends become erased, sidelined or ignored(Ault, 1994 ; The Bisexuality Report, 2012 ). Where it is not the way it is, ‘lesbian’ apparently denotes the ‘us’ category and ‘bisexual’ seems to relate to a category of people that are ‘not us’.

Extract 1 ‘For the girls: what’s on offer in this year’s Lesbian and Gay movie Tour package?’ (June 1998, p. 10)

right right Here, line 1 relates to ‘card holding lesbians’, a group of apparently ‘real’ or ‘authentic’ lesbians who will be split from ‘the bisexual audience’ (line 5). a movie ‘for’ bisexuals will probably displease and anger them more, it need to achieve this (note the deontic modality at the office lined up 1) by virtue of, plus in purchase to guard, their card holding status. There clearly was a specific facetiousness to the usage these groups, however it is interesting that the writer frames her favourable viewpoint of this movie as something similar to a confession (line 2). She also parenthetically reasserts her authenticity as being a lesbian, which seems to be at risk in such an admission, as opposed to be, by implication, an associate of ‘the bisexual crowd’ no matter exactly exactly exactly how light heartedly these categories are invoked. Read more